top of page
Search
  • Jim Costa

From Jim B. - Can "the" Government be "a" ... Which one?

Updated: Apr 3

Jim’s Daily Rant. Can The Government Judge Itself Or Be A Victim?

Here is a compelling thought experiment.

Clearly the government cannot be in charge of deciding for themselves whether or not they should indict themselves on criminal charges or not. This is precisely why we have so much corruption in our government. It is the duty of the people to stand up as faithful and wise stewards (Luke 12:42) and bring the servants who think themselves as Masters back into subjection. 

 

BUT WHY?

Perhaps it might be important that we more easily comprehend that “as people” are we operating our daily family-affairs in several different Jurisdictions - And maybe these separate Jurisdictions are operating simultaneously, but we don't comprehend it as only 1 jurisdiction.

Is that important?  Maybe :-)


Do you remember in grade school - those old overhead projectors where teachers placed blank clear vinyl 8.5 x 11 sheets and then would draw on them with colored pens. Like this one https://tinyurl.com/2xycvspk


Imagine, the teacher has already prepared part of the lesson – using two vinyl 8.5 x 11 sheets - on each 8.5 x 11 -  an identical map outline of the United States of America "appears".

In that way, we might "draw" conclusions on them separately.

 

BIG IDEA? 

Why two maps?

So in your minds-eye you might re-imagine and re-consider your country as 2 different maps and accordingly 2 different “Jurisdictions” - instead of one big political “melting-pot” of Americans operating their family-affairs.

  1. The 1st Order map is the “original” United States of American – the original organic America and American people - also known as

  • Lawfully Constituted

  • Common - Law & Jurisdictions

  • Is the 2nd Order map merely an additional re-“categor-eyezing" of the 1st Order map.  The 2nd "being" categorically called United States of America, but re-organized as-in “incorporated” . Think of anincorporation as Quasi-American Quasi-people also known as

Did DeJure people ever vote for the re-organizing of our country in that way?

Whose name-property "appears" on a birth certificate - DeFacto or DeJure?

 

WHY THEN -  2 simultaneousl Americas  (DeJure or Defacto)?

How about this pro-position? 

It appears that most American people are seemingly unaware they might be unknowingly participating in a form of European Caste System.

This Caste System might re-cognizes several different “categories” of America and American people as follows:

 

Category 1

Living people (DeJure) who possess Natural and Unalienable Rights. They are living people and Lawful Persons – a “Lawful Person”

  • These people "Live" within the DeJure American map.


DeJure People

DeJure people own this DeJure country on a DeJure state-by-state basis.  They take their DeJure nationality from their State of the Union and aDeJure Peoplere known as DeJure: Californians, Virginians, New Yorkers, and so on.  This is our DeJure political status from the 1st moment we are born on the soil of this country. 


Category 2

All other, mere “categories” of America and American people operating their family- affairs in a Quasi-America as Quasi-Americans.

  • These quasi-people "reside" within the DeFacto American map.

DeFacto does  NOT! 

NOT [ own this DeJure country on a DeJure state-by-state basis.  They take their DeJure nationality from their State of the Union and are known as DeJure: Californians, Virginians, New Yorkers, and so on.  This is our DeJure political status from the 1st moment we are born on the soil of this country. ]

 

Does this help your minds-eye see'z  what two different Jurisdictions might look like?  

One original American - the other possibly completely foreign to it?

 

Miki Klann

  Has Miki Klann "noticed"  both our minds-eye and alleged public servant's oaths and bonds - theat these "Servants" might only be servicing their DeFacto Quasi-America instead of  in-service to our original American 1st Order(s) of business - The DeJure America owed to us?


Why might this seemingly be important to consider?

 Public servants act and act(s) "in service" of (1)  jurisdiction only and not (2)

Are our "alleged" Pubic Servants act(s) and act(ing)  in only Quasi-American Pubilc Service?

Are we witnessing, in real-time, a potential foreign invasion of our DeFacto America's property and interest(s).


If DeJure America own's everything and DeFasto (Quasi) does not...

  1. Who ownes the 2nd Order Quasi-American National Debt - the incorporated Defacto?

  2. Who might owe the 1st Order DeJure American(s) back their National Credit?


What DeFacto American(s) voted for any of this?

Then who did ?

For further possibilities and probabilities ... consider these 2 additional brief links - in order


=================================================

Response From Jim Costa: You asked:

Miki Klann

  Has Miki Klann "noticed"  both our minds-eye and alleged public servant's oaths and bonds - theat these "Servants" might only be servicing their DeFacto Quasi-America instead of  in-service to our original American 1st Order(s) of business - The DeJure America owed to us?


My response is yes she does. In the process of pulling the bonds that insures government leaders of liability, she is giving them three days to rebut her Affidavit/Indictment against them. If they fail to respond within 3 days, they are in default and guilty per se.


(Note: The 3 day period to respond to an Affidavit is the same game the Corporate Government plays with traffic tickets. If you fail to rebut the ticket in writing timely, the Judge sees you already guilty, no matter what you say in court later.)

If they sign the original oath of office, and duty bound to the Republic (De Jure), then all is forgiven and they must show all allegiance to the original Republic Constitution. To them the Corporate government is now dead, otherwise they are guilty of treason.





68 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page