From Jim B - Build Bias Back Better!

Home Base

Arguably, people have several base ideas that are seemingly beneficial to consider as perhaps reliable - duplicating continuously and exponentially in size and scope.

1) To feel important

2) To be successful

From there we might simplify those ideas as follows.

3)  Self Interest

And then apply similar idea to all other people.

4)  Mutual self interest (family, local community, state, nation, inter-national, the spirit realm(s), etc..)

Thus - we commune with others (community) by use-of "trading" with each other.  We might trade ideas, goods. services, empathy, spiritual blessing, etc.  In addition we might "gift" things to others with no expectation of any direct reciprocation etc.

The opposite of consensual "trade" is non-consensual "taking".  Keeping simple ideas - simple.  Con-sense-u-all.  Con(false) or Conn(true). 

This is the world I experience when i walk out my front door each day - possibly a wee bit different than what might be seen on radio, television, internet blogs, video, social media. How about you - what do you experience?

What we focus and concentration on is seemingly important - that which we focus on most is what moves our e-motions mostly.  I like to focus on many different areas of interest(s) , but always having a home-base or basis of reliable understanding to seemingly build upon.

Co-creation

Thinking about people vs. animals. Arguably, it is my general bias that animals might co-create, but a bit less robustly than wo/man - see above (Home-base).  Are self-interest(s) and mutual self-interest(s) co-creating each day - robustly?  It appears so.

Rules

Trade or Taking - there are always consideration(s) or rules that "govern" one(s) approach.  Lets us consider such dispassionately for the moment.  We can argue, passionately, about it - tomorrow.  Never miss a potential opportunity to procrastinate - productively :-)

How do such rules start - what was the first - how might they co-create.  Rules seemingly mediate both "Trade or Take". 

How about Pre-suasion(s)?  https://samueljwoods.com/30-principles-pre-suasion-robert-cialdini-conversions/

Rules appear in the form of language - a pre, now, or post suasions?  Affecting our bias?  Probably.   What is any form of media in-formation -  mediation of bias.  In-formation appears both beneficial and tricky.

As Clif High recently noted - language transfers e-motional  in-formations.  I like that simple explanation - it fits right in with my bias ... see above (Home Base)

A Bias (by-as) might also be a mathematical order of operation function affecting settlement - perhaps financial settlement by-way of a signature  by:_____________ as ______________   settling some sort of financial transaction regarding equity (a value)

For example:  By: John Smith as agent or By: John Smith as authorized representative.

For example: Consider taking out your smart-phone and zoom in (about 10x) on the signature line of a personal check.  You might find that the line is super small print merely "apperaring" like a line, but to small for you to comprehend as a "Notice".  What does this line say to you?   How about - there is a bias you may be no comprehending - regarding the "rules".   Again, perceive it dispassionately - otherwise you'll likely miss the simplicity of it.

SCOPE

Consider all that mumbo-jumbo above as background.  What are the basics of this world's rules that pertain to in L.A.W. jurisdictions of Land, Air, and Water?  The benefit of learning how to protect your "property" in different jurisdictions (territory - a decision-space vs. free-will - a potential) is that you might not get your property damaged or "Taken" away from you by people (bias or by-as) that you thought were there to protect you.

There are different techniques to "Take" away your rights, your interests, your physical property and/or your hard-earned Equity.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-lVFKG5_08

(*** that's enough the-ink-ing for now - go outside and say "Good afternoon uni-verse - How about a group hug?"  Dont' knock it until you've tried it. :-)

I'll continue adding to this thread if Jim C. is in agreement.

In the mean time - consider keeping tabs on the in-formation or flow of his other posts.   I view them dispassionately, but many of them I find compelling  - some I do not.  My private authority and adjudication - a courting or con-side-ration being mindful that they are likely contractual aggreement(s) - a belief system.