From Jeannine - Mrna bioweapon in a court of law.

BREAKING SPECIAL REPORT: For the First Time Ever, the COVID Jabs Are Called “Bioweapons” in Court! WHAT WAS CALLED “CONSPIRACY” IS NOW EVIDENCE IN COURT!

Historic Dutch court case labels COVID-19 mRNA shots as military bioweapons. The late Dr. Francis Boyle’s testimony continues to shake the global narrative as proceedings advance.

They said it was a conspiracy. Now it stands as evidence in court. COVID equals bioweapon.

For the first time, a European court is hearing arguments that the COVID-19 mRNA injections may qualify as military-grade biological weapons. This unprecedented legal battle unfolds in the Netherlands as attorney Peter Stassen challenges the so-called Architects of the Great Reset in a lawsuit filed on behalf of citizens allegedly harmed by the injections.

Stassen has entered into the record testimony from the late Dr. Francis Boyle, the globally recognized expert who authored the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. Boyle died unexpectedly after confirming he would testify under oath. Before his death he stated plainly that the COVID mRNA injection is a bioweapon conceived by the Pentagon. Those words are no longer confined to alternative platforms. They form part of open court proceedings.

Boyle argued that the mRNA technology is directly tied to unlawful gain-of-function research funded by the Pentagon and DARPA. The platform includes a synthetic spike protein payload developed to infect human cells and a nanolipid particle delivery system designed to insert genetic material into the body. Together these elements constitute what he termed a military biological weapon system. In legal terms the technology may fall under international prohibitions on bioweapons regardless of any public-health framing.

Central to the argument is a 2015 Nature Medicine study in which scientists described synthetically creating an infectious SARS-like virus capable of robust replication. The work involved researchers from UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Boyle maintained this was banned gain-of-function research, indicating the pathogenic component was engineered rather than discovered.

He further rejected the description of the delivery system as mere fat globules. Nanolipid particles, he insisted, represent a nanotechnology-enhanced platform designed by DARPA and the Pentagon for precise intracellular delivery of biological payloads.

Expert witnesses supporting the case include medical researcher Dr. Joseph Sansone, retired pharmaceutical executive Sasha Latypova, and former Assistant Secretary of HUD Catherine Austin Fitts. They contend the COVID program was coordinated between private corporations and government agencies and name figures such as Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla as potentially culpable under the Rome Statute. These claims remain unproven yet form the foundation of the challenge.

Boyle’s signed statement remains a key piece of evidence. His unexpected death after agreeing to testify has raised serious questions among those following the case. The court has issued no ruling on the circumstances.

This lawsuit marks the first known instance of a court formally considering the COVID injection as a potential bioweapon. Whether it ultimately succeeds or not, the proceedings have moved arguments once dismissed as conspiracy into the realm of legal evidence and ongoing judicial review. No final verdict has been reached and the case continues.

Telegram