Dear Jim: RE: Greenland.

[This is from our Jeannine, the person who asked the Greenland question.]

Good morning Jim 

Interesting rant, overview. 

First of all,  I don't think I would ever have your ability to analyze scenarios like you and write a rant from scratch.  Be a great right hand protégé? Yes. But you have a God given gift like I've never seen.  And it's a doozy.

Your overview?  I think you are correct. The evangelicals said so years ago that Trump was God's man.  I wasn't on board at the time.  Although a believer I'm more logical. Very much the engineering mind almost to the point of no emotion.  

So yes I think your synopsis is spot on.  We will have "3 countries" so to speak before it all shakes out vying for the same commodities. The same consumer.  The same gold and silver.  Yada yada.

Question is:  can "America" - name could change, (Russia did...was USSR), Russia and China coexist without a war. 

Next question:  where does the Middle East fit in?  Who gets their oil and wealth? Just Saudi Arabia alone and all their oil and gold they own.   Israel.  All there  patents in water desalination, in energy conservation, etc 

Which of the three countries wins the middle East in this game of playing marbles as we did as children or monopoly if you will.

AND now that I keep typing, a dream i had about this is coming alive,  a de ja vue. 

  I have to go look at the big picture.  As in how NATO came into Greenland  via THOSE countries, who have always been neutral, as in Sweden, Finland,  Norway, and The Netherlands all arriving in Greenland.   Little shocks me.  That did.  

I have to look at their monarchy. Their banking stability. Their natural resources.  In other words, what's in it for them?  The first thing I noticed was the British not being in that quorum. 

You may post my comments if you so desire. 

   Great post..great job..Jeannine