Jim’s Rant For The Day. Back In The Seventh Grade Again.

I watched the House Hearing yesterday on the Clinton Foundation. I am going to simplify my take on that hearing and sum up a “Q” question and answer marathon yesterday with the QAnons.

My first concern with the hearing was why wasn’t Huber there as advertised? This scared me.

I was greatly impressed with the last two so called “whistleblowers”. What they really were was an amazing legal company that earns a living by auditing large non-profits to insure their board of directors that their charities are operating within the law. But in this instance they decided to investigate the Clinton Foundation on their own. They were gambling that if they turned in evidence of wrongdoing to the IRS they would take as profit 10% of the back taxes collected by the IRS. So they did not go after the Clintons for political reasons, but rather to make a fat fee on any of the Clinton’s cheating. How serious were these guys? The even had a litigator on their team to make certain that all evidence they collected would be hard to dispute or question.

The “whistleblowers” said they turned in their 3 year evidence collection to the IRS and after six months got a Decline letter suggesting it was no biggie or of concern to anyone, or something to that effect. The Decline letter asked for a rebuttal if they had one. They simply sent pictures of the two jumbo jets the FBI/DOJ recently used to seize records from the Clinton Foundation in Little Rock!

What the House panel heard was that the Foundation, by law, was not a non-profit and thus owed back taxes on Billions of donations and the donors also now owed back taxes on their donations that were originally reported as tax deductions.

What they also heard was the Clintons were embezzling from the charity, that there was indeed Quid Pro Quo in selling State Department influence and lots of global money laundering. It can also be implied that coupled with the Clinton Email scandal that treason was occurring.

My take was that the House committee was really not interested in the evidence presented and that no future action would be taken. Of great interest to me was that at the end of the hearing the chairman accused the group of coming to take up their time just for publicity for their company. One whistleblower immediately pointed out that the committee approached them two weeks ago to testify, not the other way around.

In the end it was pointed out that perhaps Huber did not show up because there may still be an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation and he would not have been able to discuss anything.

_________________________________________________

Later yesterday Q got into a question and answer conversation with some of the QAnons. (For a brief recap listen to the last 5 minutes of this audio.)

Q Indicated that the 2016 and 2018 elections would stand (meaning no one will be prevented from being sworn in to congress Jan. 3rd as we were told.)

If the above is true then I can only conclude that Trump won’t get any points on the board prior to January first and that this sickening scenario of the back and forth lies by our well paid congressmen will continue to inflict and weaken us all while the illegal Deep State continues to run.

Erin Scott broke my heart for dropping her web reporting yesterday but I appreciate her reasoning for doing so. I do not know if I want to continue reporting another year either. I am feeling like I am back in the seventh grade again wondering if Santa Clause is real and being afraid to ask my friends out of fear that their answer will be final.

If their answer is final then perhaps it is time for us to go out into the streets and use our might to bring us back to a lawful nation again. Dying in the street might be better than sitting on the couch, being lied to forever and getting another letter from the government saying, “It ain’t no biggie.”

P.S. Heads Up. This morning I never heard mention of that congressional hearing on FOX News.