Dear Jim: Re: Macro Questions.
Sure, the banks might suffer, but how does that translate into a reversion of what has been in place for 100 years? How does that get us "unlimited free energy" or expunge all debt? Bankruptcy is a contractual agreement, not simply having no money. How does it possibly shrink the leviathan that is our federal government, when all it needs in order to survive is a tax-payer base? Sorry @jimcosta , but your vision is a bit beyond my horizon, and I just don't see it. That said, I want to. Can you offer a ladder of explanation? Kauboy
Response: Q1: "Sure, the banks might suffer, but how does that translate into a reversion of what has been in place for 100 years?" Answer: Many believe there is a long-term plan underway to take out all Central Banks and the cartels that own them, including the Federal Reserve in the U. S.
Q2: "How does that get us "unlimited free energy" or expunge all debt? Bankruptcy is a contractual agreement, not simply having no money."
Answer Part 1: Unlimited energy sources have been withheld from humanity so it would be dependent/controlled by the oil industry cartels. With the Cartels gone (bankrupt) they would be freed up.
Answer Part 2: You are right about bankruptcy. But also add to bankruptcy Fraud. Fraud allows the injured party to escape a contract, such as a bank lending you your own money and failing to tell you they are screwing you. Thus all bank loans will go to alphabet heaven at the same time as those banks are adjudicated as "bankrupt" because no one is paying them anymore. Then bring in Force Majeure meaning contract impossibility or a situation both parties could not have foreseen, such as an economic collapse due to fraud.
Q3: "How does it possibly shrink the leviathan that is our federal government, when all it needs in order to survive is a tax-payer base?"
Answer: If the U. S. Republic is restored the Jurist Right of Annulment will then be told to all juries prior to deliberation. This is the opposite of the current practice of the judges not informing them of this inherent right under AngloSaxon law. That right says if just one jury member believes the if the law being brought to bear on the case being heard is un-Constitutional, then the Jury is a Hung Jury and the case must either be dropped or retried.
Thus a State Building Code forbidding you to paint your house with Budweiser beer mixed in plaid paint would be dismissed. After time, the Code Enforcement Agency will have been really downsized. Under our rules of law (case law and precedent), an Alabama case about house paint would quickly be followed by all the other states and everyone would want to be a house painter. In regards to a tax base, the IRS was created outside of the Constitution (law) so it won't take but a day for one jury member to tell it to go piss up a rope.